Get involved
Back to all

Implementation Use Case: Schools and Educational Settings

Schools and educational environments play a central role in community health due to high occupancy, repeated contact, and the importance of continuity for learning and development. This use case illustrates how shared public health models apply to educational settings and how risk reduction can support stable, in-person education under evolving respiratory disease conditions.


1. Scope of This Use Case

This page addresses:

  • K–12 schools and early childhood education
  • Indoor risk management in educational settings
  • Communication with families, staff, and students

It does not:

  • Mandate specific interventions
  • Replace education department guidance
  • Provide legal or regulatory recommendations

2. Risk Characteristics of Educational Settings

Schools are characterized by:

  • Repeated daily exposure
  • Dense indoor occupancy
  • Limited ability for young children to manage risk independently
  • Close linkage between school and household transmission

Risk in schools arises from continuous exposure shaped by routine conditions, alongside predictable periods of concentrated exposure (e.g., shared meals, assemblies, transportation), with impacts accumulating over time.


3. Impact on Attendance, Learning, and Individual Capability

Respiratory infectious diseases affect not only health outcomes but also students’ and staff’s ability to attend, participate, and learn. In the short term, illness- and chronic condition–related absences among students and teachers lead to absenteeism, disrupted instruction, and reduced classroom continuity.

Over time, repeated infection and inadequate prevention can contribute to persistent absences, reduced stamina, cognitive difficulties, and delayed learning, affecting both students and educators. Conditions that appear manageable in the short term can therefore undermine educational participation and learning capacity over longer periods, increasing inequities and compounding educational disruption.

Reducing infection risk supports attendance and learning now and helps prevent longer-term impacts that are harder to remediate once they are established.


4. Relevant Models

This use case draws primarily on:

  • Repeated exposure over time: cumulative risk accrues across school days and weeks
  • Continuous exposure and discrete events: routine school environments combine ongoing exposure with predictable high-contact situations
  • Layered protection: multiple modest measures together reduce risk substantially even when no single measure is sufficient on its own.
  • Environmental control vs behavioral reliance: infrastructure-level measures reduce dependence on sustained individual behavior
  • Normalization of harm: recurring illness and disruption can become treated as unavoidable rather than preventable

5. Common Risk Reduction Approaches

Schools often rely on layered approaches, which may include:

  • Improved ventilation and HEPA or equivalent filtration
  • Monitoring and management of indoor air quality
  • Policies that support staying home when sick, including attendance flexibility
  • Encouraging and supporting students and staff in taking improved protections, including masking, enhanced filtration, and other protective measures
  • Vaccination where applicable

Incremental improvements provide meaningful benefit even when comprehensive measures are not feasible.


6. Accommodations for Individual Health Needs in Educational Settings

While school-wide measures address shared risk conditions, individual health needs vary and may require accommodation. Providing appropriate accommodations—requested by families or staff or identified through educational and health professionals—is a routine component of educational practice and supports equitable access to learning.

Accommodations complement population-level prevention and help reduce avoidable harm without disrupting continuity of education.


7. Communication Considerations

Effective school communication benefits from:

  • Emphasizing continuity of learning and attendance
  • Framing protective measures as supportive and enabling rather than restrictive
  • Explaining why measures are proactively applied based on risk conditions
  • Clarifying that adjustments reflect evolving conditions, not crisis or permanence

Clear explanation helps maintain trust among families and staff.


8. Relationship to Current Conditions

During periods of elevated respiratory disease activity, schools may experience increased absenteeism among students and staff. Risk reduction measures that operate continuously—particularly infrastructure-based protections—help stabilize operations, reduce disruption, and support consistent in-person learning.


9. Relationship to Other Pages

This use case should be read alongside:


10. Broader Context

This use case reflects framing used across the work of the World Health Network and is intended to support educational institutions operating under evolving respiratory disease conditions.


Next page

Last reviewed on January 27, 2026

Together We Have the Power to Make a Difference

You can read more about how we work and are organized
Get involved Together We Have the Power to Make a Difference Together We Have the Power to Make a Difference